TOWN MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, TOWN-1, PESHAWAR versus RIFAT HUSSAIN
Regardless of the fact that the prohibition of section 5 & O and VIII, R 10 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), with the ban on time 5, the principal summons was, in the present case, the name of the administrator of the municipal committee only. The secretary, the local government was also a party, the secretary, without the service of the local government, had absolutely no justification for stopping the defense or shutting down his right to examine witnesses. Appeal eal In the present case, though time-barred. Was made and the law was not defined as delayed, but the court could not close its eyes and the court was unable to bring justice to the Supreme Court. I can not allow that rule, conditions, its jurisdiction amendment itself was used to stop the abuse. The process of injustice to the court and the resulting injustice, although not altogether different or preferential between citizens and the state, cannot be allowed to be treated as such. Orders should be violated. Law means protecting your rights legally
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
