WAZIR versus THE STATE
The grant of the charges against Section 9 (b) (c) and ail bail, the accused was that two kilograms of marijuana and five kilograms of cannabis were recovered from his possession. Has come under. While the death penalty was being punished, 1 kg of hashish has been recovered from the possession of every other accused. The co-accused's case was controlled under Section 9 (b) of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, which was sentenced to seven years in prison. As distinguished from the case of the accused, constipation shall not apply when any accused under the accused bail could not be sanctioned under the provisions of Section 1 of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 Control 1997 Control. His offense was punishable by death penalty under section 12. (C) Due to the death of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, the accused's case fell under the prohibited clause of section 51 above, in the circumstances the accused was not entitled to a bail exception.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Barbar Loi lawyer