Find a Lawyer

AZIZULLAH versus THE STATE

498 crime of adultery (Enforcement of Jewish Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11/16 interim bail), the complainant's affidavit alleges that the accused had abducted the girl, while the accused claimed that the alleged kidnapper Had married with a co-accused, and the alleged kidnapper appeared before the court and took his oath that he had not been abducted, but he had freed himself with the co-accused. A marriage contract was signed before the magistrate before the oath of affidavit and before the High Court on record. The kidnapper was present in court and he is the owner of the affidavit on inquiries. Although there were two versions in the case, it was not yet decided whether the accused was entitled to a discount in the interim bail. The certification was made on the same terms and conditions best advocate from Mari Indus lawyer