MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL), BOARD OF REVENUE, SINDH, HYDERABAD
Section 164 rejects the jurisdiction of the Board of Revenue Scope Board of Revenue, touching on the merits of the case and the Commissioner's jurisdiction and the applicant's limitations in relation to the legal issues raised by the applicant. This decision / order was announced by the Commissioner after hearing the arguments by the Commissioner after three months which stated that the Commissioner's order was declared illegal and bad in law, the Revenue Authorities were Judicial Judicial Tribunals and Although such authorities were not strictly judicial, yet the order passed by the Commissioner was decided only on technical grounds, the reasons for the parties being decided on merits, And to deal with it right away, technical technical issues were decided right away Instead of resolving any other reasonable and reasonable conclusions, the order to terminate the matter on hypertensive grounds was approved by the Board of Revenue as unconstitutional; it was reasonable to declare it illegal. But the issue of approving the new order was remanded to the Board of Revenue.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Quaidabad lawyer