Find a Lawyer

DHANI BUX versus THE STATE

In the absence of any unusual delay in the filing of the Section 497 Interpretation Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324 bail, FIR, the memo explained the weapon used as a 12 bore repeater. The face of the recovery memo is deeply appreciated in any way. The weapon could not be identified more specifically when a 12-bore empty cartridge was recovered from the scene of the incident and a post-mortem report found that a bullet of 12 bore was also recovered from the victim's body. Couldn't confirm. The ocular evidence was repudiated because, where the wounds did not come from the wounds, which had six marks on the body, there were some protests and riots, which resulted in minor contradictions. As a result, a passer-by was injured and could not be missed. In the event the accused's affidavit was sworn in, the affidavit of such misconduct was dropped at the bail stage, otherwise the credibility of the pass was questioned by Airbnb when he wrote his affidavit of affidavit. I mentioned his address separately from the statement under Section 161, CRPC accused were assigned a special role of rivalry between the parties, and counter-cases were filed against each other. There was no clear contradiction in the evidence that the weapon was double-edged because of the fact that the accused was unable to make a bail exception. To be taken advantage of, his bail application was dismissed top advocate from Khyber Agency lawyer