Sections 35, 36, 61 and 11 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XXXVII, Section 1 and 2 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for retrieval based on a note or a stampede on a promise note or Do not seal the scope of the scope of the reduction of the equipment exchanges, because the scope of the application was not sealed by the scope of the defendant's trial under which this request was not sealed for display of postal note. Under which the requirement of record under section 11 of the Stamp Act, 1899 was suspended. Revealed that under the Stamp Act, section 11 of 1899, section 11 of 1899, the final note was not stamped, the court requested the court not to admit any such device with evidence. What was not signed, however, was that Section 36 of the Stamp Act, 1899, considered that where an instrument was admitted with evidence, such admission, in accordance with the procedure provided in section 61 of the Act , Will not be called into question at any stage. On the basis of the same case or action that the reduction of stamp duty payment on the device, if any, could be made in accordance with the laws of Sections 35, 36 and 61 of the Stamp Act, 1899. Plaintiff wrote on the record that she was prepared to file a stamp on the Pro Note pursuant to Section 61 (2) for public use and for deprivation of state revenue and any rights arising from any device. Is. On the basis of the Stamp Act, 1899, and such statement, the High Court directed the trial court to exclude the constitutional application within a period of ten days from the pro-note within the terms of section 61 (2) of the Stamp Act, 1899. K
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
