Sections 302 (b), 452 and 109/34 of Qatil Emad, injury after assault, assault or wrongful restraint, blasphemy and joint intention to prepare. Definition of evidence The benefit of the doubt was recorded and explained with a delay of five days. For such a delay, the complainant was not trustworthy and did not plead with the senses, who were careful not to report the prosecution's witnesses to the police in this case, their statements could not be trusted that night. The incident took place in the odd hours of. 11:45 pm, but neither the complaint nor any source of light was disclosed while appearing before the trial court, causing the complainant and other prosecution witnesses to identify the suspect and other defendants to the postmortem. There was an inspection report and a fire account. When the shooter was injured, two fire shots were charged against the accused, they set up tents in the version of the litigation, in which the report of the forensic science laboratory reportedly was missing. The suspect-infested pistol 30 bore was recovered, and no case can be considered against connecting it with the accused. Of the four accused involved in the case, three were acquitted by the trial court at the same set of trials, the accused being a fugitive was not proof of his guilt. The prosecution case was full of material contradictions / contradictions. , Especially for the prosecution's testimony that the ocular account was delayed in reporting the case to the police, when they were closely related to the contradiction between the prosecution's version and the ocular account.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
