AZGARD NINE LTD. versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY
Sections 4, 2 (i), 6 and 11 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 73, 78, 77 and 199 Constitutional Requests Money Bills Scope / Taxes and Fees ? Discriminatory Contributions to Workers / Welfare Funds through Industrial Measures The applicants ignored the amendments made in section 4 of the Workers 'Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, whereby the amount of industrial contribution to the Workers' Welfare Fund was increased under the provisions of Article 73 of the Constitution. The provisions of the Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, went beyond the scope of the Federal Treasury Legislature, and such partnerships were characteristic of fees and not of taxes; Significant amendments to the constitution were Val tax ??? Money was essentially an expenditure by the public authority for public purposes, while the \ fee id was a convenient amount, and was paid for funded services. ? Industrial workers, and those benefiting from Workers' Welfare Fund spending were workers for such tasks and, therefore, lacked direct Quid Pro in such partnerships, which was considered a classic feature of the fee. Such assistants receive a suicide attack. Employers who funded the distribution of funds between taxes and fees were the beneficiaries and were primarily charged with the fact that a tax was levied on a common tax, while the fee was a special benefit payment. Or was privileged to raise funds to cover the state's required expenditure meeting, therefore, no service-related tax was tax-related. d or the special benefit or privilege granted to the taxpayer and accordingly
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
