Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), abduction or abduction (defendant) for the confiscation of section 365 property, in its supplementary statement, on the basis that the accused committed the crime before the complainant himself. In this case the name of the accused is true / it was discovered by the investigating officer, therefore, there is hardly any opportunity for the accused to confess his crime to the complainant. Extra judicial confession accused of the accused is a weak type of evidence. In the absence of direct evidence, it can be easily inferred by the prosecution that the court's bail granted below Was reasonable and reasonable. There was no evidence or observation that was inconsistent with the records or the complaints, unable to identify any unlawful action or dishonesty in the unknown order, in which case the request for cancellation of bail was dismissed. Was done
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
