Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFSAR versus BOARD OF REVENUE, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Section 3 and 5 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 42 provides for the ownership of property in respect of government land by appellants who claim that the underground crown has long been in their possession and thereby It was broken down and cultivated. He filed a petition before the Collector for the grant of more proprietary rights under the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Regulation of Notar and Grant of Open Land (Amendment) Act, 1989. After the process of law and inquiry, the Collector submitted the required deposit. Given proprietary rights in favor of And the modification of these properties was granted in their favor Respondents in their petition challenged the grant of proprietary rights in respect of the appeals and the approval of the changes in respect of which the Revenue Commissioner appealed on the sole basis. Had accepted that the land in dispute was being settled. Town Committee Limits, Appellant Appellant's File Could Not Have Proprietary Rights d. Despite accepting applicants' petitions, a review petition against the order of the Commissioner and Commissioner, which disputes that the lands were not located within the limits of the Town, on other grounds. The review petition was dismissed, which was neither requested nor the review petition submitted by the appellant, which was retained by the Board of Revenue and the High Court was fully proved by the documentary evidence of the appellant's possession of the land. The authorities below should not read gross misrepresentation and evidence on record The High Court had to be considered, it was not permissible to observe that the authorities find tracking down the facts. Together on the questions of truth how to become a advocate from Mastoi lawyer