Find a Lawyer

SARDAR MUHAMMAD AZIM ZIA, CUSTODIAN, EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR` AT MUZAFFARABAD versus NAZIR AHMED QADRI

Sections 6, 43 (6) and 57 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Members for Vacant Property (Terms and Conditions) Rules, 1992, rule 7 and 11 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government Rules of Business, 1985 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act (XXII) 1975 ), Section 4 Custody as a civil servant, the authority to take advantage of the jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal dispute was determined as the additional custodian was appointed a civil servant, as well as the custodian as a civil servant. Because the term included an additional pass in Custodian and the jurisdiction of the appeal of the Assistant Custodian and the Custodian Service Tribunal You can make a request because without any power, the Custodian operated under the A & D Immunization Property (Terms and Conditions) Rules, 1992, which was developed to exercise the powers available under section 777. The Pakistan Administration of Evacuation Property Act 1957 and only a person who was either a High Judge could be appointed Custodian. The SHE was eligible for appointment as a judge of the High Court or as additional custodian of additional custody of ADC, vice-presidents and centers for vacant property (terms and conditions) Rule 1992. The exercise of powers conferred under Section 557 of the Pakistan Administration for Vacant Property Act, 1957 was compiled by the government as the custodian and deputy supervisor were operating under different rules, which included different qualifications and style of appointment and There were different terms and conditions. Offices, Custodians cannot be civil servants and the right to use the service tribunal's appeal jurisdiction property advocates from Kotli Loharan lawyer