Find a Lawyer

HABIB-UR-REHMAN, SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER, MUZAFFARABAD versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Sections 8 and 23 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), section 44 set forth the development of a public servant in the same job in which he was an applicant, based on the AJK Social Welfare and Women Development Service Rules 1993. After qualifying the relevant exam, when the social welfare officers qualified in the relevant exam, a subcommittee was formed to propose the amendment to the Rules which stated that in Grade 17 it had already been established. Applicants holding the positions of Social Welfare Officers should be promoted to assistant directors who have Will. The promotion of the same grade 17 was done only in the higher grade and not in the same grade, in accordance with the provisions of Section 8 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 which provided the definition of development till the next higher level. Can only be promoted. It would appear that the change of grade and mere designation would not be in the scope of promoting the amendment of the rules, only to discourage applicants from promoting their legitimate rights because they, along with all of those assistant directors. There will be juniors who were already working in the department, which means they will be denied their service rights in practice. There was also a violation of Section 23 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 which provided for the making of rolls. top advocates from Jhang lawyer