Find a Lawyer

IQBAL BEGUM versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Section 9 Delays in the appeal of the Civil Service Transfer Service for Section 4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1977, Section 5, 6 and 7 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act (XXII of 1975). The civil disobedient employee was transferred from one place to another but was not relieved of his duty at the relocation site. An action was taken against them and the authority terminated their services. The competent authority was given jurisdiction to transfer the proper orders of the transfer and appointment of public servants under the provisions of section 9 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act, 1976, the public servant in a proper place Could not claim posting on location, no. Undoubtedly, instructions were issued that a public servant would maintain his posting at a particular location for a period of at least two years, however, if a person has been authorized by the competent authority to stay at a particular station for two years. Had already been exchanged, such a transfer order could not be termed invalid void merely because the government policy was passed in violation of the Government employee could not disobey the transfer order relating to the servant's transfer order. The forum had to be treated according to the therapeutic method. In the current job, the employee successfully took over the department. Because he was reinstated to the job and was entitled to his term of employment. If the civil servant is not yet satisfied, he should file an appeal before the service tribunal. best law firms from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer