SUBEDAR (RETD.) NOOR ABDULLAH versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ
Section 13 and 15 of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, Court Fee Act (VII of 1870), section 28 appeal against the rent control court fee decision was filed by the Controller's Questionnaire, but neither Neither the office nor the defendants raised any objection to the reduction of court fees when the appellant heard and decided that the first appeal of the memorandum had to bear a court fee, which was calculated on annual rent which cost Rs. 1,650, but only a court fee of Rs 15 was paid. The matter came under section 28 of the Judicial Fees Act, 1870, which brought the court It was empowered to order that the memorandum of appeal be sealed and the document so sealed, that every proceeding thereof would be considered as valid as the first time properly sealed in the High Court. Directed that the court fee of the ballot amount should be paid Rs. 1,635 on or before the due date of the first appeal memo.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Garh Maharaja lawyer