Find a Lawyer

MAKHDOOM SYED ALI RAZA SHAH versus THE STATE

Sections 32, 15, 25, 18 and 24 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 were charged with disqualification for contesting or holding public office, which is not covered by the provisions of Sections 15 and 25 of the NAB Ordinance. ? On the report and objection of the Public Accounts Committee of the National Assembly, two hundred thousand rupees were deposited on 24 1 2000, before the bargaining process of the petition of the chairman, NAB had alleged on 18-5 2000 that the judge was not held by the accountability court. Was. Under Section 15 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, a notice was issued to him for disqualification and disqualification. In 1999, the accused on the accuracy petition requested the Chairman, NAB on 12 6000, the court referred this reference to the court. Solicited an outside settlement and offered to collect the charged amount upon his request and after satisfying the unlawful gain obtained by it, a plea bargaining proceeding was taken against him. NAB Special Prosecutor Accused of Corruption Practices and Misuse of Her Powers as Public Prosecutor R had applied in court for the release of the accused even if the accused had deposited two lakh rupees on public report and objection. The National Accountability Committee, however, still had a large amount of money left over against it, which had to be paid to the NAB after filing a reference against it, and after the accused submitted his request, the amount was adjusted or Was returned. The Chairman, NAB did not contest the reference by the accused on 12 6000, but instead chose to return the profits he had received from illegal sources and the accused Chairman, best law firms from Buchay Key lawyer