ZONAL HEAD, STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ
Section 25A & 37 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 2A & 4 (1) (B) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Complaint Petition Retirement Option Applicable to the applicant Declined to accept option. In the absence of an inquiry against it by the Labor Court, the petition was returned in view of Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973. The Labor Appellate Tribunal remanded the Labor Court to seek jurisdiction over the matter, a legal proceeding initiated against the applicant has not yet been reached. The logical conclusion on the completion of the inquiry will not depend on the applicant's acceptance for retirement or the fate of such an inquiry if the applicant was of the view that the option of retirement by the Authority was unlawful. Was denied, but surely it can be cured elsewhere. Not before the removal of the Labor Court and the jurisdiction of all the courts and authorities by Section 2A of the jurisdiction, the Voice Tribunals Act, 1973 was fully liable The Labor Court did not commit any illegal interference of any kind. What led to the Labor Appellate Tribunal High Court accepting the constitutional petition and not defending the unlawful order in law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Layyah lawyer