Find a Lawyer

ASMA BIBI versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUJRANWALA

Crimes of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Articles 4 and 10 of the Ordinance 1979 and Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition were filed for FIR withdrawal because it was not abducted for adultery. Was. By someone; that the applicant has filed a case that he had freely and willingly entered into a marriage contract with the defendant and that his or her marriage contract was officially listed in the relevant office. The fact petitioner filed his affidavit in support of his record of the petition that the applicant was the real niece of the respondent's wife and that the plaintiff had entered into a second marriage agreement with the applicant during the existence of his first marriage. It was whether a man could enter into a second marriage with his wife's niece who was still in his marriage and the reason for the offense under Section 10 of the Act under the Enforcement of Adultery (Hoodwood) Ordinance 1979. She will blame the marriage. The formula is that if one of the two women mentioned above is considered male then the marriage between the two will be void. The respondents' marriage with the defendant, which was later, was not a valid marriage which would result in the applicant's marriage. At the same time, Nikai had done nothing other than the commission of adultery under Sec 4. Section 10 of the Enforcement of Adultery (Enforced Jewish) Ordinance, grounds for termination of FIR on 1979 were found to be unfounded Constitutional application was dismissed under the circumstances criminal advocate from Mangi lawyer