Find a Lawyer

SYED KHALID MASOOD versus MST. ZAHEER

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 Section 30 Withdrawal of Immovable Property and Displaced Persons Act (XIV of 1975), Sections 2 and 3 Vacancies (Slum Settlement) Ordinance (XX of 1972), Pakistan Constitution (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request for Property Transfer Occupation Retention Petitioner claimed that he had purchased the plot through auction dispute, but could not seize it, as it was in the possession of several residents. That the applicant further claimed that the colony was later declared a Katchi population and that there was no possibility of occupation and that The plot was moved them in conflictEND_SPAN Additional Commissioner settlement, but the T d was considered could not be released, because the plot was shifted to residential property. The respondent petitioner contended that it had challenged the transfer order in favor of the respondents, but the Administrator dismissed the same petitioner Nir filed a constitutional petition in which the Deputy Administrator as well as the Administrator, pending. An order was sought for the transfer of the property and the suit plot in favor of it. With the permission, the Deputy Administrator and the Administrator received the order of transfer of the plot in favor of the applicant. Since the void and responsible are ignored because the applicant had no provision in the relevant law for the replacement of the alternative plot at the relevant time and the applicant was unable to show that the argument was invalid once vacant. When the property is transferred, the transfer is in physical possession, the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 19 law websites from Zahir Pir lawyer