The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 suit denied that the defendant, who presented evidence of specific performance of the contract, refused to execute such agreement, but the plaintiff examined the author of the contract as a witness, but for no good reason The affidavit did not examine its minor witnesses, but without identifying its number on the contract, he identified it with his identification card. Such an agreement was not included in any of the writings of the plaintiff and this agreement In rejection, a minor witness was examined in the camel to confirm the validity of the agreement. ? The other witnesses presented by the plaintiff to prove the deal were neither direct witnesses to the sale agreement nor did they state that in their presence the partial payment was made by the plaintiff pursuing the sale agreement. Failed to prove:
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
