Find a Lawyer

SAEED AHMAD versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE

Sections 22A, 22B and 154 constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution petition will direct the police to register an FIR against the applicants affected by the registration of the case, before the judge but the request was dismissed. Police record restriction was the applicant's version; if the legislative case was used deliberately under the legislation, it could mean that the police officer in charge of the case had a party There was no option left to record the version where the statement / request contents are. The High Court directed the Station House Officer to file a criminal case on the petitioner's action and directed the Justice of Peace Petition to set the order passed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• IQBAL AHMAD KHAN v. IFTIKHAR AHMAD KHAN 2013 PLD 320
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. State 2013 YLR 321
• AHMAD ALI v. State 2013 PCrLJ 323
• LEO PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS v. SHAIGAN PHARMACEUTICAL (PVT.) LTD. 2013 CLD 323
• MUHAMMAD AKMAL BHATTI v. CHOLISTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2013 CLC 325
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 2013 MLD 325
• T.M.A., SAMUNDRI v. ABDUL GHAFOOR 2013 CLC 333
• Rana MUHAMMAD RAFI v. MEMBER, NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION 2013 PLC 334

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

top advocates from Ahmadpur East lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes