Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

HABIB ULLAH versus THE STATE


Testimony of Section 365/511 and 354 Counter Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (b), on the recorded version of the victim's arms by the accused, also proved that the victim was taken at the speed of 9/10. There was an improvement made by the defendant under Section 365 of the case, not enough for the purpose of kidnapping to attempt to kidnap the victim's arm, under it Under Section 365/511, PPC and Section 7 (b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the accused were convicted and sentenced. Under Section 4354, no indictment was found on the conviction of the accused, the PPC was based on substantial evidence and was sentenced at the same time.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Patoki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.