HABIB ULLAH versus THE STATE
Testimony of Section 365/511 and 354 Counter Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (b), on the recorded version of the victim's arms by the accused, also proved that the victim was taken at the speed of 9/10. There was an improvement made by the defendant under Section 365 of the case, not enough for the purpose of kidnapping to attempt to kidnap the victim's arm, under it Under Section 365/511, PPC and Section 7 (b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the accused were convicted and sentenced. Under Section 4354, no indictment was found on the conviction of the accused, the PPC was based on substantial evidence and was sentenced at the same time.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Patoki lawyer