AZIZ UR REHMAN versus THE STATE
No suspicion was made against the accused in Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, FIR except that the victim was last recovered from the accused in the company of the accused. The forensic science laboratory and, according to its report, the pistol was not recovered from the recovered property during the investigation of the accused, including three other persons who were already on bail. I was found innocent. (Crime Branch) The prosecution said that the accused had led to the recovery of the sandals belonging to the accused, which could not be called merely evidence against the accused against the need for further investigation, he was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Musafir Khana lawyer
