Of the seven witnesses to the Section 448 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) prosecution, only three private witnesses were examined, the prosecution testified against four police witnesses, including the Investigation Officer in charge, despite a guaranteed warrant. Not presented to the court. As a result of the trial court proceedings against them, the evidence of the prosecution was closed and the accused was acquitted after completing further proceedings in the case as the prosecutor failed to prove his case, the police said in the testimony. The recording of the statements was very important for a fair cause the trial court could have taken stringent measures, but it did not prefer issuing a non-bailable warrant for their attendance, nor sought the D-Section P Circle. HC sets aside the charge of the relevant police station, dismissing the controversial order to acquit the accused. Or. The trial was not conducted in the trial court because the accused was old f 88 years and faced a lengthy trial of seven years until the complainant lost his civil liberties and recorded the statements of his witnesses. Even after a trial by an elder, no result can be obtained from the trial. Accordingly, the appeal was settled
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
