Find a Lawyer

ZAHOOR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 4 West Pakistan Weapons Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13B Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 103 evidence was not associated with any recovery proceedings from the public, who was a witness to the prosecution of the PC Police Officer, Violation of the provisions of section 103 was. It has been reported that respectable people of the area were summoned for recovery, but none of the FIR's authors said that no one was present at the time of recovery. And no one was summoned from the area; the statements contained material contradictions. In connection with the retrieval, the articles related to the recovery of the prosecution witnesses were not sealed in the parcel on the spot and no expert was properly sent to seek his opinion and on the tenth occasion of the recovery No explosives expert was taken with the witnesses to prove that the articles recovered by them were taken to a specialist to determine whether the recovered articles fell within the D. The bombing case was under suspicion and prosecutors testified that almost all of the material was found. S was created conflict with each other, the trial court sentenced the accused by the prosecution, the accused against conviction and sentence above had failed to prove its case. Bad from all the charges list of advocates from Sadiqabad lawyer