Find a Lawyer

FIDA HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

The recovery of Articles 81 and 82 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Dineto Ditto / Loni, of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, was arrested on the charge that he was detained for ten days for a period of ten days. The default was to expire after The detentions were extended by the Assistant Commissioner for a further twenty-eight days that were not capable of extension which only the Collector could provide, as considered under section 82 (3) of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967. ? It was made illegal in violation of section 81 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, which demanded that a notice of demand be presented on the defaulter and in view of section 82 of the Act, in which it was provided If after a break of fifteen days. In the service of demand notice under section 11under, the lender fails to pay the dues received from it, the Revenue Officer may issue him a further notice requiring him to pay the amount and thirty days. If such notice is not paid after the period of employment, then the tax collector is entitled to issue an arrest warrant that, under the provisions of law, under sections 81 and 82 of West Pakistan. Both notices were not complied with. The Lent Revenue Act, 1967 was the same day that Ditino was working, the same day that Ditto had promised his land with the bank at the time of receiving the loan, but in order to recover the dues, the bank had to settle the property. No action was taken by the bank and instead the bank resorted to harassment proceedings against Dato / Tawani on this basis. advocate for immigration from Raiwind lawyer