Find a Lawyer

ZULIFQAR ALI versus THE STATE

Section 392 Defendant's testimony, which was neither unconvincing nor contrary to the accused's testimony, so that he could be implicated in a lie. According to the witness statement, it was the accused who took away the motorcycle belonging to the complainant which also showed that it was the accused who had removed the cash, watch and purse containing the complainant's identity card, the accused. Under the circumstances, he was truly found guilty and sentenced and the accused on appeal was excluded. It has been reported that nothing was recovered from the co-accused and the record was silent as to who had arrested the accused, according to the FIR and prosecution witnesses statement that the accused made all the charges against the Investigation Officer. Went on to say that when the accused was arrested, he was alone and the accused in the circuit was not cooperating with the prosecution. Minerals failed to establish his case against any doubt, the trial court said. The sentence and sentence sanctioned against the accompanying accused was excluded to the extent that he was acquitted of all charges. how to become a advocate from Digri lawyer