Find a Lawyer

MEHMOOD KHAN versus GULZAD KHAN

Section 8 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), claiming possession of a section 42 suit and a permanent injunction were that he was the owner. Was given. The property was recorded as the property of the defendant in the revenue record The plaintiff's suit was merely for possession without declaration of title when it was clear that the defendant was the owner of the suit. Plaintiffs proved their case unless there was a title in favor of the plaintiffs, they were not entitled to any relief, the title of the suit property was not disputed and the defendants acknowledged that the entries in the tax return were in their names. I was not. The plaintiffs associated with the entries in the Revenue Record were required to reject and prove the said entries. Had given Was accepted and the district judge's unclean decision was set aside and the civil judge's decision restored.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• IFTIKHAR AHMAD KHAN v. ABDUL MAJEED KHAN 2013 YLR 1638
• QAYYUM KHAN v. MUHAMMAD YAMIN 2013 CLC 1650
• KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA TEXT BOOK BOARD, PESHAWAR v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER IR (E&C) 2013 PTD 1651
• ASAD ULLAH v. MOHIB ULLAH 2013 CLC 1655
• SAJJAD AHMAD v. State 2013 YLR 1667
• Mst. HUSSAN BIBI v. AKHLAQ HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI 2013 CLC 1676
• HAMIDULLAH v. Haji SHER AKBAR KHAN 2013 YLR 1676
• ABDUR RAHIM alias RAHIMAY v. State 2013 YLR 1683

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

advocate from Mangowal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes