Find a Lawyer

ASAD ULLAH versus MOHIB ULLAH

A. XLI, R 27 Appellate Court's powers to record additional evidence The appellate court may exercise its own authority to present additional evidence and in exceptional cases such power was permitted to be used in the amending phase, additional evidence Should have been direct, and in this case had a significant impact on the important issue and also to prevent abortion of justice, however, such power could not be exercised where the controversial document was not relied upon in the trial court. ?

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• ALI AKBAR v. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIR LINES 2013 MLD 1637
• IFTIKHAR AHMAD KHAN v. ABDUL MAJEED KHAN 2013 YLR 1638
• QAYYUM KHAN v. MUHAMMAD YAMIN 2013 CLC 1650
• KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA TEXT BOOK BOARD, PESHAWAR v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER IR (E&C) 2013 PTD 1651
• MEHMOOD KHAN v. GULZAD KHAN 2013 MLD 1666
• SAJJAD AHMAD v. State 2013 YLR 1667
• Mst. HUSSAN BIBI v. AKHLAQ HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI 2013 CLC 1676
• HAMIDULLAH v. Haji SHER AKBAR KHAN 2013 YLR 1676

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

property advocate from Renala Khurd lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes