MUHAMMAD AZAM versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUJRAT
Punjab Police (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1975 Rr 3 (b) and 4 (1) (a) (iii) (b) (i) Punjab Rural Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 of the important rank professional. Failure to manage. Follow Legal Process, Being a Public Employee Police filed an FIR in a serious case, rather than lodging a complaint as a public servant, even though the act constituted misconduct. No corrupt motive was mentioned in the showcase notice. The government employee's share of government employee removals was improved on the same day and he voluntarily admitted his mistake The Service Tribunal changed the penalty from one of the key positions to stalled development for a year. Went and ordered again. Government employee in his position
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
