AZHAR ABBAS, SUB ENGINEER (CIVIL) versus THE CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION, LAHORE
Sections 2 (1) (a) and 10 (3) of Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, R22 Ad hoc abolition of Government employees who were appointed on ad hoc basis, served for a considerable period. Give up In some cases, for more than five years) the services of public servants were terminated on the basis that ad hoc appointment under R22 of 1974, Punjab Government Employees (Appointment and Terms of Service) was only one year. Could not have been increased without it. The relaxation of the rules and appointments accordingly may not give the public employees any right to continue for an indefinite period if this position continues and cannot be terminated until regular appointment by a regular officer. Cannot be terminated without legal justification Government employees had the right to continue and hold their positions because they held their office at the time of approval of the suspension order until regular election was made available by the President. Adherence to the rules and regulations of the government employees were terminated, with no legal authority to terminate
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
