ZUBAIDA BIBI versus MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT HEADQUARTERSHOSPITAL, GUJRANWALA
Punjab Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1975 Rr 4 (1) (a) (i) (b) (iv), 16 and 18 Examination of dismissal rehabilitation dismissed as a public servant. Sacked from the job, she is alleged to have been absent for nine days and was ordered to vacate the residential quarter. At the department's appeal, officials turned the major dismissal penalty into a small sentencing sensation when a government employee on demand failed to vacate the quarter, when authorities reviewed their previous review. When the matter was decided, they did not have the authority to review the same matter, only the government has the power to review under the R18 of the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1975. The previous order was revised by the appellate authority because of a malice in the eyes of the law, in which circumstances it was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer