SHAFIQ AHMED versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT
Section 8 Punjab Public Service Commission Regulations, 1987, Regulation 2 (c) Punjab PC Section (Judicial Branch) Service Rules, 1962, R9 Seniority, Civil Judges, Commitment to Government's Request for Recruitment for 29 Posts of Public Service The Commission had requested applications for the said positions and as a result of the selection process, it declared 39 candidates, including government employees, successful and the required 29 seats were filled out of 39 successful candidates. Another request was sent to the Commission. The positions of civil servants of civil judges who were successful candidates on the first occasion but were not absorbed against When considering the appointment against them, approached the government to represent the 50 posts filed by them and the constitutional application was dropped. , But he succeeded in the intra-court appeal, and he was recruited as a civil judge for the additional 50 vacancies in the second and third batch, and the seniority list government employees were placed below government employees. Extra vacancy for civil servants in two batches as per the decision passed in the intra-court appeal Adjustments were made against the anti-Semites, which had previously been requested to appoint 29 public judges, in which, despite being public servants, successful employees were not considered for the appointment of public servants whose first batch The officers were chosen, he said, as well as claiming seniority along with the batch and entitled to keep them above the officers of the second and third batches, and if government employees were not below them, through the commission. The first successful Q
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Landi Kotal lawyer