Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MALOOK versus THE STATE

Sections / 304/4 324/7 33 AA (i) The evidence was appreciated at the time of the incident and the FIR was immediately filed and the accused was the original nephew of the accused and the complainant was not the previous enmity of the liar. My relationship with the witnesses in the indictment or with the deceased for substitution of the accused had no room to refute their testimony that the presence of the prosecution witnesses was established on the occasion. The recovery of the weapons of crime along with the medical evidence was fully confirmed by the ocular account under which the vacancies were lengthened according to the report of the forensic science laboratory prosecution. The trial court can set its own case against the accused without any doubt, conviction and punishment, in which case the accused cannot be intercepted for brutal murder; There were no mitigating circumstances. female advocates from Kunri lawyer