Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/337 F (iii) / 34 Definition of Evidence, The accused's motive was not proved by the complainant The prosecution's story against the accused was confirmed by three injured witnesses Was present and not on the spot. The accused contradicts my medical examination The witnesses, who belonged to the complainant's brother, had no basis to refute the testimony because the accused repeatedly denied his medical legal reports. No action was taken to investigate. The accused confessed to the accused that the complainant was the aggressor and had fired in self-defense, no evidence was confirmed, the incident was a daylight and the FIR was immediately It was recorded that the forensic science report laboratory was inaccurate and the investigating officer made a purchase to assist the complainant because there was no O. It is alleged that the sealed parcel was tampered with by one of the prosecution witnesses. During the investigation, it was not found that the witnesses of the deceased or the accused had arrived on the spot and the accused was officially armed. He pleaded that he acted in his defense, not understandable. The prosecution's case was proved by the ocular account of the witnesses of the complainant and the injured prosecutor, and to deny their testimony in their relationship. Had no basis because there was no evidence of previous serious animosity between the parties and the Auler account was further confirmed by the medical. Through the trial court for the recovery of evidence as well as the crime weapon divorce advocates from Wahi hassain lawyer