Find a Lawyer

AMEER KHAN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), provisions 3 && & evidence 376 accused were named in the FIR which was immediately recorded and it was an incident in the light of day. It was imposed that, known as the prosecution's witnesses, there was no question of identifying the error. Or was the alternative accused, who alleged that the prosecution's witness was trapped by the previous enmity, failing to record anything to prove that the witnesses were the real culprits except the real culprit? It was a former rival to the accusation or the alternative. According to the Accular Account and the location of the incident was also not disputed, my relations with the prosecution witnesses had no basis for rejecting their testimony because they had no previous hostility against the accused because of their prosecution in prisons near them. The witness's presence was a natural absence at the scene or the weakness of the motive, there was no basis for the award of the two witnesses' statements affecting trust, but the statements of both witnesses were credible. No contradiction was brought to the record, but medical evidence and this The accused was tried through an ocular account for the purposes of. , The appeal against the trial court's decision was dismissed, and he was sentenced to death immigration advocates from Akhora Khattak lawyer