SARFRAZ versus SULTAN AHMAD
Articles 21 and 25 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 and the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 164 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The application order for the submission of a diatribal money in the failure of the former emperor of the trial case was issued. Later, the pre-emptor / decree holder, who failed to collect the data within the stipulated period, filed an application for extension, which was rejected simultaneously by the trial court and Additional Commissioner, Revenue, but the Board of Revenue amended the application for the same Extension 6N. In the time filed by the premature umpires / regulators, the extension of the term did not include preferential reasons; in both cases, the extension of the term and order of the member of the Board of Revenue changed the outcome along with the tribunal. The request for was rightly rejected. The amending jurisdiction is not in accordance with the law. The High Court set aside its constitutional jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Khandabad lawyer
