Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus MUHAMMAD YOUNAS

Neither these events nor the two accused were acquitted on the occasion of an appeal against a bad prosecutor accused of failing to prove a Section 417 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Article 302/325/452/34. In connection with the incident, he participated in events and pleas whose credibility could not be doubted, the witnesses were truthful and there was no complaint or complaint from the complainant. The alibi taken by the suspect was satisfactory that two fatal injuries to the victim were attributed to the two accused and the doctor stated that all the injuries sustained by the death of the deceased were due to a single shot. The reasons may be when the investigating officer admitted during the night. Checked that the prosecution's witnesses did not identify any bulbs inside the room nor showed them the Major's defect in the prosecution case as the injured eye witness was never presented by the prosecutor to the police. No recovery was recovered from the scene of the incident while the prosecution witness confessed that there was only one shot in the room and the gun was not reloaded by the accused but it was closer to the fact. It appeared that the complaining party had come to seize the plot and fire the victim by someone. An incident was reported at night and the identity of the assailant was also suspected there was no major error or fault. The trial court's decision sought to find out the extent to which it could be changed to a guilty verdict. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mangal Sada lawyer