The final discovery of fact by the two courts in terms of section 42 of the Q 42 Law of Martyrdom (of 1984 of 1984), Arts 72, 79, 117 and 120 suit cases, the Onus plaintiff in the case claims in favor of the accused in return. The unlawful and fraudulent trial court and the lower appellate court have dismissed the case simultaneously, and the appeal filed by the defendants is valid, on behalf of the defendants and their signatures and thumb impressions are void. And clearly acknowledged the registered acts. The burden of proof has always been on the plaintiff to prove that the plaintiff failed to substantiate his claim through mere, conclusive and reliable oral and documentary evidence. The revenue officer's affirmation / officer signed it and was impressed by the thumb seller and in his presence it was confirmed that all the matters in his decisions and orders were recorded on the evidence recorded on the two court records below. Was based on proper definition of and the well-established plaintiffs failed. To review any illegal, material irregularity, misreading or non-reading of evidence or any jurisdictional error or defect found by the High Court in the investigation with the two courts below. Interference with the use of the scope can be guaranteed. Revision rejected in circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
