SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus S.H.O./INCHARGE, POLICE STATION MIRPUR ABBOTTABAD
Article 9 489 FINE PAKISTAN, ARTICLE 199 199 petition The constitutional petition was to dishonestly issue a check of the FIR's allegation against the accused (applicant) that he had paid the complainant (the defendant) with the amount owed. Issued a check for, but said it was disclosed in the case that the complainant had pretended to be the officer of the provincial chief minister and that his son could be employed in the provincial government department. Had received a controversial check from the accused. The defendant's confession was that the FIR was unfounded; the complainant received a controversial check as security to provide employment to his son, and the witness in whose presence the complaint was given to the complainant , He recorded his statements before the police and the magistrate, expelled the accused from the commission. The complainant on the accuracy of the offense merely alleges that the accused owed him money without making any reference to his inter-related relationship which led to the amount against the accused against Section 9489F, PPC. Owed, which is in connection with the payment of a payment in return for a person. Loan or fulfillment of an obligation but in the present case no friendship, business or close family relationship was referred by the complainant to the amount allegedly given to the accused, it was a large sum of money. The information given to the person of the record of a written contract shows that several FIRs were filed against the complainant, the facts and circumstances of the case showed that the FIR was invalid and false. Was formed and according to this
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
