FOUNDATION FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Constitutional application of Arts 199 and 245 (1) Geneva Convention, 1949, drone strikes / strikes by secret agency of a foreign country (USA) in the territory of Pakistan, violation of the legal status of sovereign territory / UN Extra-judicial killing of civilians by violating Pakistan of the United Charter and its Convention on War Crimes Destruction of immovable and immovable property compensates victims of drone attacks Pakistan's armed forces to protect sovereign territory and airspace The compensation is paid by the foreign country itself (the state itself) to the tribal agencies of Pakistan. The hijacked foreign militants are considered to be their enemy, and drone strikes were carried out in intelligence-based areas to target and kill these elements. The foreign agency's secret agency is to establish the opinion that drone strikes target groups of men. The militants belonging to terrorist groups were based on fantasy. The proportion of killing of foreign elements (via drone strikes) was strangely significant while the deaths of foreign countries and non-combatants were surprisingly significant. The proportion of casualties has not been presented by foreign country authorities and intelligence agencies in this regard so far as reliable, reliable and reliable evidence has been presented. In addition to the damage to local population property, their families and other transferable properties, the victims of drone attacks were mostly women and young children, including breastfeeding children, livestock / livestock and wild animals. Health Dag During Life Drone Attacks
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
