SYED PERVEZ MUSHARAF versus APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR GENERAL ELECTION 2013
For membership of the Parliament with the approval of Arts 6, 62 (1) (F) and 199 Representation Public Act (LXXXV of 1976), Section 14 High Treason (Punishment) Act (LXVIII of 1973), Section 2 Constitution Petition Disqualification (Council of Councils) Unlawful measures for life Control of the enforcement of human rights abuses martial law and holding default elections High court judges illegally detained prisoners and their families The appointment of judges of the judiciary to stop the electronic and nomination of candidate papers in response to the print media question, which was former President Pakistan and also the Chief of Army Staff, The Returning Officer Election Tribunal passed the Returning Officer's order rejecting the nomination papers of the candidates for which they banned them. The country also rejected the entire judiciary through emergency and unauthorized sources. The candidate confirmed that all his alleged unconstitutional actions were approved by the Supreme Court and then by the 17th Amendment to the Constitution from Parliament in 2002. Further endorsement was made, so he could not be selected as a usurper, the candidate was ousted during the uprising the elected government imposed an emergency which was almost a martial law. All elected bodies, such as parliament, provincial assemblies, federal government and provincial governments (cabinet), were dismissed, and officially elected president. Highly organized and predetermined, the door to the exit candidate in question, he held the elections of parliament and provincial assemblies in 2002 and the governments of his choice
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
