Find a Lawyer

MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD., KARACHI versus IQBAL AHMED

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Sections O15 (3) (b) and (4) of a bank employee working as a cashier Dismissed. After questioning him on this charge, the services which he received in his possession from a second branch of the bank were found to be short-staffed, in three inquiries, for embezzlement / misappropriation of a sum of two lakhs. Was found and liable. Labor court dismissed the employee's dismissal on the basis of good bankruptcy and inquiry, the Labor Court accepted the employee's request for a complaint against him, stating that the charge against the employee was not proved. And while the allegations were in fact nothing, the slightest irregularities were the bank's instructions and rules for which the employee was not responsible because he acted under the orders of his superior officers in the criminal case. On being sued, he was acquitted and the trial court acquitted the employees of all liability in connection with the disappearance / loss of money, despite being losers in the criminal case, the employees were liable for lack of money. The clerk was indicted, the employee argued that he was bad in a criminal case against her. No useful motive should be presented for departmental proceedings against him ?? Employees were subordinated because he was negligent and did not have to be careful in performing his duties, even though he was bad. Could not explain how to make money property advocate from Gawadar lawyer