Section 302 (b) Conan Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Clause 3 Qatil-ud-Amad praises the evidence of his nephew, aged 9/10, complaining of this minor boy from one village to another in the darkness of night. The trial court did not appeal to the prudent mind of anyone to inform, that the trial court recorded the statement of the minor boy without any action. Assess the level of intelligence, maturity and compromise under Article 3 of the Law Constitution Shahadat, 1984, the statement of the child's witness clearly implied that he was not present at the home at the relevant time and Didn't see this incident and it wasn't. To tell the truth, according to this minor witness's version, his mother was stabbed by his father / suspect, but medical evidence has revealed that the deceased died of a single firearm injury to his chin. St. Injury and the inquiry report was also silent about the knife wound. The minor witness did not show the presence of his father / suspect in the room, according to the minor when he entered the room, he saw his mother lying on the bed and shortly afterwards on the spot. While not bringing any injuries, it was stated that the claim revealed that he had not seen the accused inside the room, the statement of the witness of the girl, in the circumstances, had caused a lot of suspicion and in fact affected It was contended that the testimony of the minor witness was not confirmed. A piece of evidence Medical evidence, Recovery by chance, Recovery of crime weapon, Site plan and arrest of the accused, No required support was provided There was no link in relation to the evidence of the prosecution, which provided material
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
