Section 302 (b) / 324/337 F (ii) (iii) / 337 D Qtl e amd, causes any person to report misconduct and delay in the registration of verification of lost evidence, which otherwise justifies It was submitted that it was used for advice and fabrication charges could not be understood. It was alleged that he was a hard-hitting and frustrated offender. The complainant party belonged to the same village, and the tribe of the accused party was disputed in two places for the recovery of land from blood stains. The report of the suspect in the forensic science laboratory showed that the two weapons had been emptied, post-mortem reports of the wounded and medical legal reports of the two wounded were also, according to the prosecution's version, both injuries were confirmed by each other. On all material points, he was subjected to lengthy and cross-examination by the defense, but nothing could be extracted from him, though the two injured men were the victim's sons, but with their suspect. There was no previous hostility or misconduct, in the absence of which they could not be called interesting witnesses. Yes. And no one is expected to include innocent people instead of the real attackers, when they are attacked by two wounded witnesses to be strong, strong, consistent and confident against them. Was presented with an ocular account, whose existence was undoubtedly established. Three accused were charged with effective firing. One of them was acquitted, while the other was absconding, whose presence was shown near the place of the accused by the trial court,
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
