Find a Lawyer

SYED FAQIR SHAH versus HAJI INAYATULLAH KHAN

Section 14, 17 and 30 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 158 Submission of the award to the court by arbitration to rule the court urges the applicants to have the award 77 days after the application is filed. An application for separation was filed. Served with a notice of the date, time and place of the arbitration proceedings, the boundary limit will not come to justice, when the arbitrator did wrong on his own when a party accused of not recording a notice. I supported the petitioner's request dismissed in circumstances to make the award roll in court

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• Mst. SABARHI TAJ v. SALTANAT KHAN 2013 YLR 669
• SHAH HUSSAIN v. FAHAD 2013 PCrLJ 675
• AZIZ-UR-REHMAN v. MUHAMMAD SAEED 2013 CLC 682
• SIRAJ v. State 2013 YLR 684
• MUHAMMAD NASEER KHAN v. GENERAL MANAGER (HR-OPS), SUI NORTHERN GASE PIPE LINES LTD., LAHORE 2013 PLC(CS) 698
• UMER ZAMAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 708
• MUHAMMAD SHAHAB v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Health, Peshawar 2013 PLC(CS) 712
• ALAM KHAN v. The STATE through Additional Advocate-General 2013 YLR 714

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes