ALAM KHAN versus THE STATE THROUGH ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE-GENERAL
Section 777777/111111 Unnecessary crime, delay in filing a report attempting to commit evidence, was not fatal in the prosecution case in such cases, especially when the identity of the accused was not suspected. And when there is more evidence on the record than the one that constitutes the crime of the accused, people are avoiding unwanted advertising. And the parents feel the humiliation and humiliation they described in detail about the incident by the accused Victim, which was permanent and natural. And it was unbelievable that a 12/13 year old boy could make a false case for involving the accused. Or that he could replace the accused for someone else, the complainant was fully involved in the charge of attempting to commit an unnatural crime with him. The complainant's version was corroborated by eyewitnesses, the complainant did not raise any ill will, resentment or malice against the accused on the basis of false allegations. In this case, the complainant and the eyewitness testified, they had to undergo a lengthy investigation through the defense of the lawyer, but nothing was removed from them, both witnesses were reliable and reliable and they were Not to be discredited, contradictions pointed out by the accused's lawyer will not make the whole case unreliable and cannot be ignored, due to the absence of witnesses being trivial in nature. We have to suffer Said that the witness did not come before the accused had completed the commission of the offense of the defective accused, before that the trial court had also sentenced in another case the offense under section 777777, PPC.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
