Article 9 (c) Conan Shaheedat (10 of 1984), Article 122 The possession of evidence and the confession of evidence The benefit of the suspect was the accusation against the accused that he was sitting in the rear seat of the vehicle, in the circumstances, the driver and The fugitive co-accused was prominent in the prosecution case, in which case the first person needed to prove that the person was in joint ownership. And that vehicle was under his control, or he was in any way responsible or dealt with the property, especially if the drug was hidden in the car's secret palms, There was no evidence that the person knew that his life was secretly hidden in palms, or that he knew of the place, so the law would attract the provisions of section 1222 of Sha22, 1984, 1984 of If the suspect was open or if he knew the location of the property, the situation would have been completely different. It is stated that as a passenger, he hired a taxi to take his wife to the hospital, he presented a medical prescription to prove his wife's illness and the confiscated witness admitted that the vehicle The driver of the vehicle was not in the vehicle at the time the suspect did not try to escape from the vehicle and did not appear to be prohibited in the vehicle, in the circumstances it could be a prohibited substance, or it was related to the co-accused who was in police custody. There was no attempt by the prosecution to indicate that the driver fled, or the driver was not present at the relevant time. I did not have anything recorded in black and white, which could be difficult to identify the culprits. Offense or to show that the record by the trial court
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
