Section 302 (b) of the law, on the evidence (10 of 1984), section 46 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), section 160, section 64,, has been charged under CRPC, alleging that the accused had poisoned. By killing the victim. There is no direct evidence in the form of an account of the incident, nor is there any evidence that could link the accused to the commission of the crime, in relation to the mother's statement of the deceased, It cannot be believed, as it was not registered according to the procedure provided in the Police Rules 1934, and the deceased's mother remained silent for two months, and then it was alleged that her daughter accused had died. Had poisoned his mother and killed her, had ties to the accused and was interested in her punishment, so, It cannot be conceded that the statement of the witness was always suspicious, and he could not be trusted to record the sentence in the capital charge. He was alleged to have been sentenced on the basis of circumstantial evidence which was weak and scattered. The case was not based on legal evidence. Or evidence of a legal result, the trial court recorded only the assumptions and assumptions against the accused, regardless of whether it was anyone else, but the accused, who reported the case shortly, and He kept in touch with the investigator and did not try to flee, but surrendered to the police, alleging that he was innocent, records show evidence of the incident was strange. In the background, Mutofi committed suicide or was poisoned. Someone else
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
