Sections 302 (b), 324, 337F (II) and 353 Qatil Amad, attempt to commit a Ummah, which prevented any person, assault or criminal force from paying his duty to public employment. Would be appreciated. The benefit of the doubt was not derived from any special recovery of vacancies assigned to the accused by the site plan. The prosecution's case was not based on proper account and smoothness, the prosecution and the negligence came to light as the full version of the prosecution recorded the injured witness two months later by the investigating officer who recorded the evidence of the star's injured witness. Due to the version of the prosecution was suspected. The site was suspected, with significant evidence being talked about by the prosecutor. The prosecution's rush to prove his case against the defendants was not without any shadow of litigation. In the mind of the prudent mind, the benefit should be extended to the accused when, on the same set of evidence, the co-accused was acquitted, the accused also deserved equal treatment and the conviction and punishment of the accused approached at trial. The verdict was set aside by the court, and the accused was acquitted of the charges leveled against him, and he was released in the circumstances. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
