Articles 2 302 (b) and Q 84 Counseling the conviction of the accused person, the death sentence, the plea of insanity request, the default event immediately filed FIR to the medical evidence Conflicting Account Identification There is no possibility of misidentification error or retrieval of weapons and their vacancies were allegedly shot and killed with a criminal mind because they were suspected of having illicit relations. What was the case, the trial court sentenced the accused to death under Section 2302 (b); the PPC's position on the accused was that he was mentally unstable. The verdict was, and that he committed the crime as a result of sudden and serious provocation. The defendant's mental state dispute was neither raised at the time of the accusation nor at the time of recording his statement under Section 342, CR PC. No request was made by the accused in the trial court to confirm his mental state through the formation of a med board, and to this day it has been alleged that the mental state of insanity raised by the accused on the pending stage. No evidence was brought on record related to the record. It cannot be considered that the accused entered the house and found his brother asleep while his wife was presenting him, so serious and sudden outrage for the accused. There was no reason to take action based on the current crime was a pre-planned incident Report this incident Was lodged within hnty event location was a remote area at 24. Proper transportation facilities 25 km away from the police station
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
